Last year on July the 21st NASA’s Space Shuttle
programme officially came to end when Atlantis returned to Earth after
completing its final voyage. Since then the US government has withdrawn from
manned space flights, relying on the Russians and Chinese to ferry American
astronauts to and from the international space station. Western governments are
slowly abandoning space exploration and turning their attention towards more
Earth-bound problems. In the age of austerity and economic stagnation, space
exploration seems like a past excess we can no longer afford (along with public
sector pensions and healthcare it appears). The space shuttles stand as a
towering monument to the optimism of a by-gone age, when we thought the white
heat of technology and Keynesian demand management could have saved us from
ourselves. Many hold the same opinions of space exploration as they do of the
welfare state, that it was a costly mistake fuelled by optimism and good
intentions but ultimately lacking a grounding in the reality. With the space
shuttles sent to museums and with no government plan in place to replace them,
private companies such as Richard Branson’s Virgin Galactic are vying to be the
dominant powers in our upper atmosphere. Some see this as an indication of the
way the western world is heading with more and more of what we thought could
only be handled by the government being taken over by private companies.
While America is already being nostalgic about the days of
space exploration, on the other side of the world government space programs are
very much alive and well. China and India are currently engaged in a space race
of their own with the former launching their Tiangong-1 space laboratory in
September last year and the later aiming to be the first nation to return the
moon since Apollo 17 in 1972. In these countries their space programs are a
source of enormous national pride, especially as they take over the arena
previously dominated by the globe’s fading powers. As the age of US, Britain
and Russia ends and their space programs are discontinued and new generation of
super powers are aiming not only to conquer the world but also the space above
it. Even North Korea maintains its sights on the stars with an attempt earlier
this year to put a satellite into lower Earth orbit. This attempt was
unsuccessful but it was unprecedented in the level of access foreign media was
given to the launch, indicating how confident the famously isolationist state
is in their rocket scientists. In these countries space exploration is not
considered to be an extravagance of an overly confident super-power but part of
the global coming of age process and vital arm of both industry and government.
However, space exploration is not just for rival super
powers or a way for newly emerging economies to show off. In Nigeria firms are
partnering with western experts to develop a national space industry with
satellites already successful launched. These industries (supported by the
government) are seen as a way of training workers in important 21st
century skills of computer programming, engineering and micro-electronics. The
space industry also has a positive economic effect in fostering a high tech
support industry that offers well-paying jobs and boosts national income.
Creating a space industry is seen as a wage to develop the national
infrastructure with the aim of growing the economy and lifting people out of
poverty.
Western economies showing sluggish growth could learn from
these countries who are investing in an advanced technological industries and
enjoying strong growth. Investing in space technology for Nigeria and China is
having a positive effect on people on the ground by developing industries and
training workers. It would be reprehensible to let the west’s flaunted
competitive advantage in high tech industries slide to other countries because
we were unwilling to spend the money needed to support it. Space exploration
creates growth in in all manner of industries from software design to metal
casting. Through government investment in large scale projects like space
travel, money will pass to the industries needed to support space exploration
and from them to the industries which provide the basic components and raw
materials for these high tech firms causing the economy as whole grow.
Something western governments are crying out for.
In order for the industry to progress, technical innovation
is necessary. The old vertical take-off model used by the space shuttle and
Apollo program might have to be replaced by the more efficient horizontal take
off model favoured by Virgin Galactic and other private space ventures. Also
for the industry to reach its full potential corporation is needed to spread
the costs and ensure that the economic benefits reach all the denizens of
Earth.
The strongest argument for global co-operation in space
exploration is that the space industry is unlike any other industry in the
world in its unique ability to inspire people and capture their imagination.
The draw of the stars is irresistible to many and space exploration has given
us the world’s most frequently used image (the Earth from orbit) as well as the
iconic moon landing footage. There is no greater symbol in thawing of the cold
war than a Russian Cosmonaut and an American Astronaut shaking hands in orbit
in 1975. Great deeds inspire people on the ground to reach further and
accomplish more, it is a symbol of how far we have come as a civilisation since
we first discovered fire and a reminder of how far we still have to go to reach
the heavens.
If Nigeria and China can find the economic argument for
space exploration than surely it remains relevant in the west as well. In an
age of tempered ambitions and cut backs we need the symbol of stirring
accomplishment to inspire us. Not to mention the economic and scientific
benefits that space exploration can bring. The space shuttle was an ambitious
programme, much like the New Deal’s program of public works which lifted
America out of the great depression. It seems our leaders are keen to remind us
that we live in a time where we can no longer afford ambition and we should fix
our sights lower on what we can accomplish. No wonder disillusionment has
replaced the white heat of optimism. I believe there is still an argument for
space exploration just as there is still an argument for ambitious government
projects whether they come in the form of the space shuttle or the welfare
state.
No comments:
Post a Comment